|
In tax-deferred exchanges, as in other real estate transactions,
sellers sometimes are compelled to carry back financing as part of the
transaction. This article will explore the different ways in which seller
carryback notes may be utilized and the practical problems and tax
consequences of their use.
Terminology
It is important at the outset to clarify the terminology which will
be used in this article. The "Exchangor" is the person seeking to
dispose of one property and acquire another in a tax-deferred exchange. The
"Relinquished Property" is the property which the Exchangor is
disposing of and the "Replacement Property" is the property which
the Exchangor is acquiring in the exchange. The "Buyer" is the
buyer of the Relinquished Property and the "Seller" is the seller
of the Replacement Property. The "Intermediary" is the person or
entity which acquires and transfers both the Relinquished Property and the
Replacement Property in the exchange.
The "First Escrow" is the escrow in which the Relinquished
Property is transferred by the Exchangor to the Intermediary and by the
Intermediary to the Buyer. The "Second Escrow" is the escrow in
which the Replacement Property is transferred by the Seller to the
Intermediary and by the Intermediary to the Exchangor.
The "Buyer's Note" is a seller carryback note executed by
the Buyer in the First Escrow as part of the consideration for the
acquisition of the Relinquished Property. The "Exchangor's Note"
is a note executed by the Exchangor as part of the consideration for the
acquisition of the Replacement Property. Use of a Buyer's Note in an Exchange
The most common use of a seller carryback note in a tax-deferred
exchange involves the execution by the Buyer of a Buyer's Note as part of
the consideration for the Buyer's purchase of the Relinquished Property.
Example 1A: Adam Apple enters into a purchase agreement to sell
Whiteacre to Betty Beans, provided that Betty Beans cooperates in Adam
Apple's intended tax-deferred exchange. The purchase agreement provides that
the price is $600, payable $400 cash and the balance payable by Betty Beans'
execution of a Buyer's Note for $200.
The first issue that arises is whether the Buyer should execute the
Buyer's Note in favor of the Exchangor or in favor of the Intermediary. The
answer is that the Buyer's Note should be payable to the Intermediary rather
than to the Exchangor, as the Intermediary is the party from whom the Buyer
technically purchases the Relinquished Property.
Example 1B: In Example 1A, Adam Apple subsequently executes an
exchange agreement with an Intermediary and assigns the purchase agreement
to the Intermediary. At the close of the First Escrow, Adam Apple deeds
Whiteacre to Betty Beans, who delivers $400 cash to the Intermediary and
executes a $200 note in favor of the Intermediary (the "Buyer's
Note"). Note that in Example 1B direct deeding is utilized so as
to avoid the imposition of double transfer taxes and recording fees. Reg.
Section 1.1031(k)-1(g)(4)(iv)-(v). Disposition of the Buyer's Note
After receiving the Buyer's Note at close of the First Escrow, the
Intermediary can do one of three things with it: deliver the Buyer's Note to
the Exchangor; sell the Buyer's Note to a third party; or deliver the
Buyer's Note to the Seller as part of the consideration for the purchase of
the Replacement Property. Let's look at each of those alternatives.
Delivery to Exchangor
Clearly, the most practical thing for the Intermediary to do with the
Buyer's Note is to transfer it to the Exchangor when the exchange has been
completed. After all, the Exchangor has agreed to the terms of the Buyer's
Note as part of the negotiations on the sale of the Relinquished Property.
Example 2: In Example 1, Adam Apple then enters into a purchase
agreement to buy Greenacre from Charlotte Chops for $600 cash and assigns
that purchase agreement to the Intermediary. At the close of the Second
Escrow, Adam Apple delivers $200 to the Intermediary, who pays $600 to
Charlotte Chops (i.e., the $400 cash which it was holding and the $200 cash
which it has received from Adam Apple). Concurrently, Charlotte Chops deeds
Greenacre to Adam Apple and the Intermediary transfers the Buyer's Note to
him.
Unfortunately, receipt of the Buyer's Note presents a substantial tax
risk to the Exchangor since the Buyer's Note constitutes "cash
boot" if and when it is received by the Exchangor. The Exchangor's
realized gain will be recognized to the extent of the value of the Buyer's
Note unless the Exchangor is entitled to offset cash boot paid in the
exchange against the cash boot received. Reg. Section 1.1031(d)-2.
In Example 2, the "cash boot" which is being paid by the
Exchangor (i.e. $200 cash) is a different form of "cash boot" than
the Buyer's Note. It is not clear under existing law whether one type of
cash boot may be offset against another type of cash boot. See Franklin
G. Biggs (1978) 69 TC 905, aff'd (5th Cir. 1980) 632 F 2d 1171.
One possible solution to this problem would be for the Exchangor to
execute an Exchangor's Note mirroring the terms of the Buyer's Note. Note
than when an Exchangor's Note is utilized, it should be payable to the
Intermediary and assigned to the Seller at close of the Second Escrow rather
than be payable directly to the Seller.
Example 3: In example 1, Adam Apple enters into a purchase agreement
to buy Greenacre from Charlotte Chops for $600, payable $400 in cash and the
balance payable by the Adam Apple's execution of a $200 note (the "Exchangor's
Note") with the same terms as the Buyer's Note. At close of the Second
Escrow, Adam Apple delivers to the Intermediary the Exchangor's Note.
Concurrently, the Intermediary delivers to Charlotte Chops the $400 cash
which it is holding and the Exchangor's Note which it has received from the
Exchangor. Charlotte Chops deeds Greenacre to Adam Apple and the
Intermediary delivers the Buyer's Note to him.
In Example 3, even though the Exchangor is "paying" cash
boot in an amount equal to the Buyer's Note, and in a form virtually
identical to the Buyer's Note, it is unclear whether the Exchangor is
permitted to offset any cash boot received (i.e., the Buyer's Note) by any
cash boot paid (i.e., the Exchangor's Note). Reg. Section 1.1031(k)-1(j)(3). Delivery to Seller
A second alternative is for the Intermediary to transfer the Buyer's
Note to the Seller as part of the consideration for the Replacement
Property.
Example 4: In example 1, Adam Apple enters into a purchase agreement
to buy Greenacre from Charlotte Chops for $600, payable $400 in cash and the
balance payable by the assignment to Charlotte Chops of the Buyer's Note.
Adam Apple assigns this purchase agreement to the Intermediary. At close of
the Second Escrow, the Intermediary delivers to Charlotte Chops the $400
cash which it is holding and it endorses and delivers to Charlotte Chops the
Buyer's Note. Concurrently, Charlotte Chops deeds Greenacre to Adam Apple.
This solution is ideal from a tax standpoint, as the Exchangor has
not actually received the Buyer's Note and will not be treated as having
constructively received it as long as the "qualified intermediary"
safe harbor rules are followed. Reg. Section 1.1031(k)-1(g)(4).
Even if a Seller is willing to carry back financing, the Seller
usually prefers to receive a note secured by the property he is selling
(i.e., the Replacement Property) rather than receiving a note secured by a
property with which he is totally unfamiliar (i.e., the Relinquished
Property).
Sale to Third Party
The third alternative is for the Intermediary to sell the Buyer's
Note and to deliver the proceeds to the Seller as part of the consideration
for the Replacement Property.
Example 5: In Example 1, the Intermediary sells the Buyer's Note to
an unrelated third party for $170. Adam Apple enters into a purchase
agreement to buy Greenacre from Charlotte Chops for $600 cash. At close of
the Second Escrow, Adam Apple delivers $30 to the Intermediary who delivers
$600 to Charlotte Chops (i.e., the $570 which it is already holding plus the
$30 received from Adam Apple). Concurrently, Charlotte Chops deeds Greenacre
to Adam Apple.
In theory, a sale of the Buyer's Note by the Intermediary has no
adverse effect on the Exchangor. However, if the Intermediary sells the
Buyer's Note to a person or entity related to the Exchangor, the I.R.S. may
contend that party is acting as the agent of the Exchangor, who then should
be treated as having received cash boot.
Conclusion
Copyright © 1998 Richard A. Goodman |